Alliance One-Pagers

The 1989 Montreal Protocol ratification and its mandated CFC and HCFC phaseouts posed a daunting challenge to fluorocarbon producers. The aggressive phaseout timetables presupposed that safe, cost effective and environmentally acceptable alternative products could be rapidly developed and manufactured. New product development and

*** HFC Production Facility ***

commercialization --- from product formulation and plant construction to toxicology and environmental impact screening --- had to be competed in incredibly short time frames to avoid significant societal disruption.

Industry responded with unprecedented creativity and innovation. Individual fluorocarbon producers rapidly increased resources --- people, time and money ---- toward alternative product development and commercialization. Industry partnerships under the Programme for Alternative Fluorocarbon Toxicity Testing (PAFT), allowed resource pooling to screen likely candidates. Potential environmental impacts were studied through the Alternative Fluorocarbon Environmental Acceptability Study (AFEAS) group.

Industry's huge undertaking resulted in a comprehensive line of safe, non ozone-depleting, high performance, cost effective compounds that are in widespread use around the world today --- HFCs. These compounds were extensively studied before their introduction, with over $41,000,000 spent in PAFT & AFEAS studies alone.

The unique properties and performance of CFCs, and the lack of understanding and consensus about their environmental impact led to widespread use. With the CFC and HCFC phaseouts, HFCs and other options are being considered as replacement products. HFCs enjoy widespread use because of their overall effectiveness and attractive properties. However, non-fluorocarbon alternatives are also being used in applications such as refrigerants, propellants, foam expansion agents, and solvents, presenting different options and tradeoffs in terms of cost effectiveness, safety and energy efficiency. All alternatives require chemical processing, whether hydrocarbons, ammonia, CO2 or HFCs.

HFCs offer the highest overall value in many applications. Producers advocate an approach of "responsible use" predicated on the concepts of highest-value applications, safety, total environmental impact, emissions reduction/control, energy efficiency, and total system cost. This ensures that both industry and consumers have options, societal needs are met, innovation is encouraged, and environmental impact is minimized.

HFC production requires longer, more complex processes and more sophisticated technology than the simple CFC manufacturing processes. Many products, such as propellants used to deliver drugs for the treatment and control of asthma, or refrigerants, must meet stringent quality and purity standards. Producers have developed and installed new, more efficient systems to minimize operational and process emissions. Modern HFC plants have sealed systems and closed loop transfers for both internal transfers and for loading and delivery of bulk customer shipments. HFC process leaks are limited to about 0.1% of total production, resulting in negligible environmental impact from handling.

Worldwide, industry has invested well over $40 billion to replace ozone-depleting CFCs with safe, effective, high performance HFCs.

Fluorocarbon producers are stewards for the products they make and sell. These products need to be safe to manufacture, transport, store, use and either dispose of or recover. While individual companies have specific policies and goals, common general principles for product stewardship include:

The Alliance for Responsible Atmospheric Policy is a leading industry voice which coordinates industry participation in the development of reasonable international and U.S. government policies regarding ozone protection and global climate change.