HFCS ARE PART OF BALANCED SOLUTIONS FOR SOCIETY.
Comprehensive national climate change plans use the basket approach to
reduce emissions of the six principal greenhouse gases, including HFCs.
With respect to HFCs, the plans should fully balance relevant environmental,
safety, health, energy efficiency, and economic factors.
Life Cycle Climate Performance (LCCP) is a tool that should be used to
evaluate the environmental benefits of refrigeration, air conditioning and
insulation.
HFC emissions reductions are already occurring through voluntary actions
and industry-government partnerships. Such partnerships are also jointly
engaged in research, communication and other activities to find new technologies,
designs and processes to enhance overall product viability, including energy
efficiency and cost.
The UNEP Technology and Economic Assessment Panel (TEAP) of the Montreal
Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer (1999) concluded that
HFCs are important to the current safe and cost-effective phaseout of CFCs
in developing countries. They are essential substitutes for highly important
uses of ozone-depleting substances and are also technically and economically
necessary for phase out of HCFCs in developed and developing countries.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Assessment
Report (2001) documented options for reducing emissions of HFCs and concluded
that for some HFC applications, alternatives are not technically and
economically feasible.
The European Union's submission to the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change (July 1999), stated, "Action taken to reduce HFC emissions
should not undermine the efforts to phase out ozone-depleting substances."
A report by Arthur D. Little entitled Global Comparative Analysis of
HFC and Alternative Technologies... (2002) found that HFCs are the preferred
alternative to replace ozone-depleting substances where they provide superior
overall technical, environmental, and safety benefits.